Much like contactless card usage, Mobile Pay adoption grew in 2020. According to Auriemma’s Wave 3 issue of Mobile Pay Tracker, 40% of those eligible to use mobile payments report doing so, level with the all-time peak reported in W2-20.
(New York, NY) The death of plastic. Apple Pay’s launch in 2014 invited headlines touting the digital payments revolution, but in the years since, plastic has thrived. Consumers swiped, they dipped, and now they’re beginning to tap– all with a physical card. Some argue that the proliferation of tapping a physical card at checkout will increase comfort tapping one’s phone. However, a new issue of Auriemma Research’s Mobile Pay Tracker suggests that contactless cards may have some mobile-friendly consumers reverting from digital to physical payments.
Although mobile payments and contactless cards utilize the same near-field communication (NFC) technology, adoption of mobile payments is well behind contactless cards. Three plus years after its mainstream release, mobile payments have only been used by one-third of those eligible—far less than the 59% of contactless cardholders who have tapped with their contactless card.
Consumers appear amenable to contactless cards, specifically because the device (i.e., the physical card) is so familiar. Mobile payment users, however, are even more open to tapping their cards because they’ve been exposed to tapping with their phone. Three-quarters of mobile payment users have used a contactless card to make a contactless payment, compared to just four-in-ten non-users.
“Consumers have been repeatedly asked to change their payment behavior,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Auriemma Research. “While adjusting to various card payments is easy, the larger switch in the physical mechanism of phone payments takes more time.”
Mobile payment users are enthusiastic about contactless technology. The majority (60%) expressed interest in using contactless cards, compared to just over one-quarter of mobile payment non-users. Mobile payment users are also more likely to believe contactless payments can improve everyday purchases. Over one-third say their experience with self-checkout lanes, grocery stores, vending machines, and public transportation would be made better if they were able to use contactless payments.
Until now, many terminals were not accepting of EMV contactless payments because of outdated technology. This has been a struggle for EMV contactless cards as well as Apple, Google, and Samsung Pay. However, with Visa now requiring all contactless terminals to support NFC contactless technology, both EMV contactless cards and mobile payments will have the space to grow.
Although these upgrades will make mobile payments an option at an increasing number of locations, that doesn’t mean mobile payment adoption will rise. Overall, consumers are uncertain about whether contactless card payments are better or worse than mobile payments—65% say they are about the same, 18% say they are better, and 17% say they are worse.
Those who believe contactless card payments are better typically say they are faster, easier, and more secure than mobile payments—three things mobile payment users often describe when asked why it is better to pay with mobile then with plastic. Those who believe contactless card payments are worse often express concerns about security (e.g., more susceptible to fraud, wouldn’t be any safer) and say they still need to take out their payment card.
“Consumers will have more options at checkout than ever before, but will they choose contactless cards or a mobile wallet?” asks Holmes. “Although upgraded terminals benefit both methods, the point-of-sale experience continues to be fragmented for mobile payment users who must pull out their physical card when things go awry.”
With contactless cards, technological barriers to tapping won’t upend the entire payment process. Consumers can still dip or swipe. This alone makes the case for contactless cards, which offer the mobile payment benefits people love without the barriers that have persisted since its rollout.
Survey Methodology
This Auriemma Research study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) between January-February 2019, among 2,001 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 8/8+7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+/SE/X or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S9, S9+, S8, S8 Edge/Edge+, S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7, or Note 8 – Gear S2 or S3 watch (in combination with an Android/iPhone smartphone) – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name.
About Auriemma Group
For more than 30 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.
(New York, NY): After a year of celebrity following its release in late-2014, Apple Pay had to share the spotlight with Android Pay and Samsung Pay. Since then, the market has grown even more crowded, with merchants, such as Walmart and Kohl’s, developing Pay options for their consumers to use at the point of sale. But according to Auriemma’s Q1-2018 Mobile Pay Tracker, usage of Apple, Google (formerly Android), and Samsung Pay has still managed to grow five points (to 34%) compared to Q1-2017. While this growth is a positive for mobile payments, a declining proportion of these users would recommend the service, signaling trouble ahead.
“The influx of new players makes the future of the Big Three uncertain,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Payment Insights at Auriemma. “Being first to market hasn’t given Apple, Google, or Samsung a leg up on mobile payment newcomers. Providers who are able to deliver a more positive, reliable Pay experience are most likely to encourage continued Pay usage, while others may struggle in the years ahead.”
Problems at the point of sale can prevent even the most enthusiastic Pay users from developing the habit of paying with their mobile device. This, in turn, lessens the opportunity and likelihood for recommending the service. In fact, 42% of mobile payment users wouldn’t recommend the service, up 11 points compared to last year (31%). And because these sentiments are strongest among the most inactive Pay users (87% very inactive vs. 6% very active), it’s clear developing the habit is key to the success of mobile payments. But this routine could be more easily developed with merchant mobile payments, which have more control over their Pay experience and can eliminate many of the barriers that trouble Apple, Google, and Samsung Pay users.
Merchants have an advantage over the Big Three: a guarantee of acceptance across all its stores and a uniform in-store experience. While most of Apple, Google, and Samsung Pay users think in-store acceptance has improved since these mobile payments launched, reported issues at the point of sale have remained the same compared to last year. Among the issues, unfamiliar cashiers and an inability to complete the transaction come out on top, with a plurality of in-store Pay users who quit and decide to swipe their card instead. All of this could potentially be avoided with a well-conceived Merchant Pay option.
“Merchants have the power to create a frictionless mobile payment experience,” says Holmes. “They can train their store employees to become Pay champions who promote the payment option, offer assistance, and do so in a way that keeps lines moving and customers smiling.”
Survey Methodology
This study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group (Auriemma) in January/February 2018, among 1,527 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 8/8+/7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+/SE/X or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S8, S8 Edge/Edge+, S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7 or Note 8 – Gear S2 or S3 watch (in combination with an Android/iPhone smartphone) – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general-purpose credit card in their own name.
About Auriemma Group
For more than 30 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.
(New York, NY): In both the US and the UK, a growing ecosystem of mobile pay providers hope to become consumers’ go-to payment method at checkout. But the future of mobile payments appears more positive across the pond, where contactless payment technology has made familiarity with tapping at the point of sale more prominent. Auriemma Group recently conducted a parallel study among cardholders in both the US and UK markets, aimed at learning about mobile payment adoption, satisfaction, and how comfort with contactless technology could impact mobile payments moving forward.
A small but notable proportion of credit cardholders (‘cardholders’) in both geographies have adopted mobile payments. While UK cardholders are slightly more likely than their US counterparts to have used Apple Pay (12% vs. 9%) and Visa Checkout (9% vs. 6%) within the past month, other options, such as PayPal In-Store Checkout (5% each) and Android Pay (4% each) show similar usage patterns. Although usage metrics are low, satisfaction with each technology is extremely high.
Over 90% of users in both geographies say they are satisfied with their mobile payment app. However, while it may be true that satisfied users are more likely to continue using than dissatisfied ones, user satisfaction alone does nothing to introduce non-users to the technology. UK consumers have a slight advantage in this area, given their introduction to contactless payment technology has familiarized them with tapping at checkout.
“UK consumers were introduced to contactless payments in 2007,” says Jaclyn Holmes, the Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights. “Their increased comfort with this technology, in the decade since its inception, makes payment behavior at the point of sale less of a barrier for mobile pay adoption. If anything, paying with a tap has become more natural for this population than their US counterparts, who only recently began the move from swipe to dip.”
While exposure to contactless payments may increase comfort with mobile wallets, the shift from brick-and-mortar to online shopping creates an opportunity for mobile payments to grow. Most US and UK cardholders have made an online purchase on their smartphone, but a notable minority (31% and 40%) have not. And there is a link between comfort with making an online purchase via a smartphone and usage of mobile wallets more generally. Notable proportions of US and UK cardholders who have made online smartphone purchases have ever tried mobile wallets (33% and 43%, respectively). This is in stark comparison to their less smartphone-friendly counterparts, who are much less likely to have used a mobile wallet (7% and 5%).
“Cardholders who are more accustomed to shopping on their smartphone are more likely to pay with their smartphone in-store, especially in the UK,” says Holmes. “The US may have had the advantage of earlier exposure to mobile wallets, but the UK’s history with contactless has made the locale ripe for adopting a variety of mobile payment options. Increased familiarity with contactless payment technology and comfort with the smartphone as a payment device will be necessary to encourage the growth of mobile payments.”
Survey Methodology
These studies were conducted online within the US and UK by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group. The UK study (Cardbeat UK) was fielded in August 2017 among 500 adult credit cardholders and the US study (The Payments Report) was fielded June/July 2017 among 800 debit cardholders, of which 567 were also credit cardholders. The number of interviews completed for both is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing among sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ±5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed, nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying. The average interview length was 20 minutes.
About Auriemma Group
Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. Founded in 1984, Auriemma has grown from a one-man shop to a nearly 50-person firm with offices in New York and London. For more information, contact Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.
(New York, NY): Mobile pay usage among eligible consumers is down 5% compared to this time last year (25% vs. 30%). And the decline in adoption is expected to continue into Q4 – a period that has seen seasonal dips in Mobile Pay usage the past two years, according to Auriemma Group’s Mobile Pay Tracker. This new research reveals a myriad of reasons why consumers aren’t adopting mobile payments quickly, including a lack of need and interest, and that Net Promoter Scores (NPS) are seeing significant declines. But some barriers are directly influenceable by merchants and issuers alike, namely security concerns and problems at the Point of Sale (POS).
Nearly one-third (32%) of consumers cite security concerns as a top barrier for using mobile payments. A slightly smaller proportion (21%) actually believe the method is unsafe. Auriemma’s research identified specific ways mobile pay providers could alleviate concerns that block the trialing of mobile payments.
For one, 58% of consumers want issuers to assure them that mobile payments fraud will be covered by the bank, similar to card-based payments. And 57% of customers would like to see data demonstrating the security of mobile payments, with 43% wanting direct comparisons to more common payment methods such as magnetic stripe and chip cards.
“Issuers who do these things could find themselves at the top of the mobile wallet for new adopters within their customer base,” says Jaclyn Holmes, the Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights. “In an environment of heightened consumer anxiety regarding data breaches, it is critical to clearly communicate mobile payments’ security to customers.”
Confidence with security alone, however, isn’t enough to grow mobile pay adoption. Merchant acceptance is crucial for establishing habitual use, but many Pay users run into problems at checkout. These issues at the POS are a great risk to the most active mobile pay users, who experience the highest incidences of disrupted transactions.
The majority of Samsung Pay (74%), Android Pay (63%), and Apple Pay (52%) users consider themselves to be at least somewhat active. A notable proportion of each have said they encountered a problem at the register (44%, 33%, and 37%, respectively). The top reason for the issue, however, is unfamiliarity of store personnel (55%) followed closely by problems with the actual terminal, including “transaction did not go through” (46%) and “terminal took too long” (35%).
These issues have a clear impact on Pay user’s likelihood to recommend the service. Auriemma research reveals sharp declines between Q4 2016 and Q3 2017 in the Net Promotor Scores (NPS) of Apple Pay (from 22 to 4), Android Pay (from 18 to 13), and Samsung Pay (from 46 to 21). While Samsung Pay’s technology should render it mostly immune to problems at the POS, even it has had difficulty staying away from issues.
“One of the key benefits of Samsung Pay is that it can be used anywhere that accepts cards,” says Holmes. “But even its enthusiastic user base risks becoming disenchanted by recurring issues at the POS.”
Problems at the register don’t just impact behavior at the transaction-level. Half of those who had problems at a retail location that accepts mobile payments say the issue made them use the service less often overall. Problems at POS are particularly perilous for cards at the top of the digital wallet, who have the most to lose if the Pay transaction is unsuccessful. In fact, 45% of in-store Pay purchasers quit trying to use mobile payments entirely, and use a physical card instead.
There are many ways to educate those wary of the method, but the real question is whether issuers and merchants are willing to put in the time to train their customers and employees. While merchants may want to offer their customer’s preferred payment method, offering it without the proper employee training and support stops mobile payment adoption in its tracks. Likewise, issuers who make their card compatible with a mobile wallet without educating customers of its benefits are forfeiting potential utilization. Issuers who want to remain or become top of the mobile wallet, and merchants looking to provide a seamless payment experience for those Pay-preferred, play a pivotal role in getting them off the ground.
Survey Methodology
This study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group (Auriemma) in July/August 2017, among 1,505 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S8, S8 Edge/Edge+, S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7 – Gear S2 or S3 watch (in combination with an Android/iPhone smartphone) – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general-purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, eleven in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted in August 2017.
About Auriemma Group
Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. Founded in 1984, Auriemma has grown from a one-man shop to a nearly 50-person firm with offices in New York and London. For more information, contact Jaclyn Holmes at 212-323-7000.
(New York, NY): Mobile pay users are an enthusiastic bunch, but admit they sometimes forget to choose mobile payments at checkout. New data from Auriemma Group’s Mobile Pay Tracker suggests that transaction-based incentives may provide the nudge needed to get higher frequency and spend through mobile pay. The study of 1,505 mobile pay eligible cardholders didn’t just reveal incentive’s benefits to Pay providers, but to issuers and merchants as well. Those who leverage incentives are positioning themselves for greater success as mobile payments become more commonplace.
Regardless of who funds the incentives, issuers, merchants, and Pay-app providers all have something to gain. Increases in mobile pay spend and frequency of use will have a marked impact on the most frequently used (MFU) card in the mobile wallet, while also encouraging use of mobile pay instead of a physical wallet. As the mobile pay user population grows, it will become increasingly important to be the top of mobile wallet card. Interestingly, two-thirds of mobile pay users already say that the MFU card in mobile pay is also their most used card overall.
“While cards used in the mobile wallet benefit from merchant- and Pay-funded incentives in the short term, those not already being used could miss out, especially as mobile pay grows,” said Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights. “Pay apps very well may be the future of payments. Incentives provide an opportunity for issuers and merchants to have consumers associate their brand with the payment method, which could turn out to be a valuable long-term investment.”
Currently, 25% of consumers with an eligible smartphone use mobile pay, mostly composed of a highly covetable demographic of employed, affluent, and college-educated consumers. Of these consumers, 32% recall being offered a mobile pay incentive (compared to 19% earlier in the year), and when the incentive is offered, the take rate is high: 86% of incentive recipients report claiming the incentive at the point of sale in-store or in-app.
In the past, these incentives were primarily offered by banks, but in Auriemma’s most recent study the proportion of banks offering incentives to their customers compared to last quarter dropped from 58% to 40%. Merchant-funded offers are now most prevalent (46%), and regardless of who offered the incentive, nearly eight in ten respondents (78%) report their offer was linked to a specific merchant. Many consumers, however, are not seeking these incentives out—most hear about them from friends, or through emails or letters.
Consumers who are offered incentives, unsurprisingly, use mobile payments more frequently than those not offered—demonstrating a clear influence on choice of payment method at checkout. Over a one-week period, for example, those who received an incentive to use mobile pay in-store did so 4.6 times, compared to 3.1 times for those not offered an incentive. The same is true of in-app purchases, with incentivized shoppers purchasing four times in a week, compared to 2.4 for those not offered an incentive.
“Incentives can give consumers the push they need to use mobile pay,” said Holmes. “Their greatest impact will be on consumers on the cusp of using the method, but who need an additional nudge.”
Survey Methodology
This study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group in November 2016, among 1,505 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7 – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, ten in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted during December 2016.
About Auriemma Group
Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at 212-323-7000.
(New York, NY): For over a year after its introduction, Apple Pay was the only real option for consumers who wanted to pay with their smartphone. That changed towards the end of 2015, when Android Pay and Samsung Pay were rolled out. Among the three payment options, Apple Pay captures the greatest proportion of eligible users, with 33% of iPhone 6 owners* reporting that they’ve used it, but the fledgling Samsung Pay isn’t far behind at 23%, according to recent research by Auriemma Group. The firm’s latest Mobile Pay Tracker found that Samsung Pay users report higher satisfaction levels and fewer issues at the point of sale compared to Apple Pay, with near equal proportions recommending both mobile payment brands.
Since its inception, Apple Pay has attracted educated, affluent, and young users, and Samsung Pay users look similar. “Only the newest, and most expensive, models of phone support mobile payment, so owners tend to be affluent,” says Marianne Berry, Managing Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights practice. “Owners of the Samsung Galaxy and Note look demographically similar to owners of the iPhone 6 series, although iPhone owners are almost evenly divided between men and women, whereas Android phones, Samsung included, tend to skew male.” Within the pool of eligible phone owners, mobile pay users are even more affluent and well-educated than non-users.
Users of both mobile pays rate their experience positively, but Samsung Pay users report higher levels of satisfaction than their Apple Pay counterparts (92% vs. 84%) and are near equally likely to recommend the application (49% vs. 53%). “The impact of satisfaction becomes more telling when we examine how these users pay for their monthly purchases,” says Berry. “The majority of Samsung Pay users utilize other payment methods less since beginning with Samsung Pay. No other mobile payment application can say that.” In fact, Samsung Pay eligible consumers report the highest proportion of discretionary spend going to the payment app (22%), while Apple Pay eligible consumers cite a lesser proportion (15%), behind both credit card and cash spend.
Samsung Pay users also spend more using the service ($82 vs. $75) within an average week. They report fewer difficulties at point of sale (19% vs. 31% for Apple Pay), presumably due to the technology that mimics the magnetic stripe and allows it to be used at a much wider range of merchants. “Samsung Pay advertising highlights this benefit, and 37% of those who are aware of this have used the method where other mobile pays aren’t accepted,” says Berry.
Where signage isn’t easily viewable, Samsung Pay users show greater enthusiasm to use the method in-store, with 56% always asking store personnel about acceptance compared to 42% of Apple Pay users. “Some of this may be due to its newness, with most Samsung users reporting three months of experience compared to a year for Apple Pay,” says Berry. “Even so, Samsung Pay outscores Apple Pay on a number of metrics. Right now the pool of eligible Samsung users is much smaller than Apple’s, but as more Samsung phones are upgraded, the application’s broader merchant acceptance has the potential to more quickly convert its smartphone owners to Pay users.”
Survey Methodology
The study was conducted online among 2004 consumers in the US with Apple Pay eligible (n=1,000), Android Pay eligible (n=838), and/or Samsung Pay eligible (n=327) smartphones between March 3 – April 7, 2016. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S)* – a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5 – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, twenty in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted March 21, 2016 – March 25, 2016 via telephone with Android Pay and Samsung Pay users recruited from the quantitative web survey. For this round of IDIs, the focus is or was on the Android and Samsung Pay users, and their usage and experience thus far.
About Auriemma Group
Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.
New York, NY): Back in October of 2014, Apple Pay was launched with great fanfare, and for almost a year it was the only game in town for consumers who wanted to pay with their smartphones. Since then it’s been joined by Android Pay and Samsung Pay, with more branded mobile payment solutions, such as Walmart Pay and Chase Pay, waiting in the wings. But is anyone using them?
The answer, according to the latest Mobile Pay Tracker survey from Auriemma Group, is a qualified yes: about 7% of all smartphone owners* claim to have at least tried mobile payments. “It’s important to remember that less than half the smartphones that US consumers carry are capable of mobile payments,” says Marianne Berry, managing director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights practice. “Among those with an eligible phone, 27% of consumers we surveyed say that they have used Apple, Android, or Samsung Pay.”
However, that doesn’t mean they can leave their wallets at home yet. Mobile pay users still put the lion’s share of their purchases on old-fashioned plastic, since stores that accept mobile payments are still hard to find in the US: 39% say they would use mobile payments more if more stores/apps accepted it. 61% say their mobile pay usage is supplanting cash transactions, suggesting that the phones are being used for smaller purchases, confirmed by average ticket size—-one-third of those who have used mobile pay in the past week made a purchase of $25 or less. These transactions are made both in-app and in-store, except for Samsung Pay, which has yet to offer in-app payments. On average, users report that 17% of their discretionary spending was done with mobile pay.
Even when they find a store that accepts mobile pay, only one-third of mobile pay users (31%) pay that way every time they know it is accepted, most frequently citing that they simply forgot. “Reaching for the phone instead of the wallet isn’t an automatic reflex, even for mobile pay enthusiasts,” said Berry. “And even if they do remember, many will give up and use their plastic cards if they encounter friction at the point of sale, particularly if there are other shoppers in line behind them.”
Mobile payments have been around for only a year, a fraction of the many decades that plastic cards have dominated. As the upgrade cycle puts the newest smartphones into the hands of more consumers, increasing numbers of them will have the opportunity to try out this new way of paying. “Overall satisfaction with mobile payments is quite high at 80%, despite complaints about low merchant penetration and inconsistent customer experience at point of sale,” Berry stated. “But mobile payment has yet to reach the tipping point that will take it from novelty to norm.”
Survey Methodology
The study was conducted online among 2004 consumers in the US with Apple Pay eligible (n=1,000), Android Pay eligible (n=838), and/or Samsung Pay eligible (n=327) smartphones between March 3 – April 7, 2016. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5 – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, twenty in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted March 21, 2016 – March 25, 2016 via telephone with Android Pay and Samsung Pay users recruited from the quantitative web survey. For this round of IDIs, the focus is or was on the Android and Samsung Pay users, and their usage and experience thus far.
* Auriemma conducted a standalone market sizing study in March 2016 among 1,100 US adults. Data was weighted by gender, age, race/ethnicity, household income, and education to be nationally representative of the entire US adult population (aged 18+).
About Auriemma Group
Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information call (212) 323-7000.
By Rene Ritchie, iMore.com
Thursday, Aug. 6, 2015
The tale of two Apple Pay surveys.
There have been some conflicting surveys out about Apple Pay in the last couple of weeks, one of which says the mobile payment service is growing and the other, declining. So, which is it?
The Auriemma survey is clear and up front about where the data comes from, is easy to read, and comes off as professional and, well, sane:
Apple Pay usage in the US is growing, driven by both increased frequency of transactions and the expanding base of iPhone 6 owners, according to Auriemma Consulting Group’s Apple Pay Tracker, which interviewed 500 iPhone 6 and 6+ owners between May 29 and June 15, 2015. Forty-two per cent of Apple 6/6+ owners reported having used Apple Pay, virtually identical to the proportions reported in two previous waves of the study conducted in February and April 2015. “While the proportion of users has remained stable, the denominator has grown through new iPhone and Apple Watch sales and the upgrade cycle. We’ve also seen the average number of transactions increase both in-store and in-app,” says Marianne Berry, Managing Director of ACG’s Payment Insights practice.
They go on to say Apple Pay is considered to be move than a novelty, is growing at points of purchase, and that there appears to be lots of room for further growth.
The PYMNTS/InfoSocut is the opposite. It’s almost impenetrable, written as half-narrative about a conference, doesn’t clearly say where the data comes from, and is filled with comments from people who appear to have competing interests to Apple Pay—including the CEO’s of Paypal owned Paydient and Samsung-owned LoopPay. Which is, frankly, bizarre.
In March, survey data indicated that 15.1 percent of eligible Apple Pay users had tried the service – when surveyed in June 2015 that had fallen to 13.1 percent.
Usage fell as well – when asked in March, “Did you use Apple Pay on this transaction,” 39.3 percent of consumers said yes. When asked the same question in June, only 23 percent replied in the affirmative.
They go on to say Apple Pay has dipped with committed users and that Apple Pay doesn’t sell phones. Then they go into the appalling quotes from competitors.
iMore hasn’t looked into Apple Pay usage among iPhone owners yet, but we did ask Apple Watch owners as part of our ongoing survey. We’re only a quarter of the way through the data collection phase right now, but with thousands and thousands of responses in already, the numbers are currently as follows: 60% have used Apple Pay at least occasionally, and over 30% use it whenever it’s available to them.
That’s for a service that, until very recently, was only available in the U.S., is still only available in the U.S. and U.K., is still adding banks and retailers, and won’t be launching support for loyalty and store cards until iOS 9, later this fall.
Still, we’ve seen how Apple Pay accessibility can empower people:
That Apple Pay on the iPhones 6 (and [the] Apple Watch) works so effortlessly that it instills feelings of empowerment and independence for users with disabilities is profound.
How Apple Pay is automagically secure, which literally turns what previously was an extremely stressful experience into a delightful one:
The first time you experience this seamless transfer of your accounts with Apple Pay, you’re going to want it everywhere you purchase goods and services. That, combined with very positive word-of-mouth, is going to make entering a card number feel very antiquated. And I suspect this change will come about very quickly.
And how great Apple Pay is to use on the London Underground:
Apple Pay is a great way to get around London. Keep your wallet safely tucked away in your bag or pocket and better keep track of your transactions. I managed to visit London for two full days without using the debit card connected to my Apple Pay
Without more data, it’s impossible to tell with an absolute certainty which set of numbers most accurately present the current state of Apple Pay growth. It’s pretty easy, however, to judge the companies presenting the data. AGC is clean, clear, and professional. PYMNTS/InfoSocut rings just about every integrity alarm bell imaginable.
Negative Apple headlines drive a lot of attention, though, so it’s no surprise the negative numbers are getting a lot of pickup. Still, it’s better to look at both sets, and both companies, and match what they say against your own experiences, and then decide for yourself.
For me, I’ll be using Apple Pay as much as possible as soon as possible.