, , ,

Point-of-Sale Installment Plans Are Redefining What’s Affordable

(New York, NY): Shoppers purchasing a new iPhone have two choices at checkout—pay up to $1,500 up front or go on a $60 per month payment plan. It is a familiar set up for anyone who has taken out a home, auto, or student loan: Buy now; pay over time.

Similar plans are emerging in several consumer categories beyond cell phones. Networks, issuers, merchants, and marketplace lenders offer plans in-store and online for consumers who want to pay in installments. Auriemma Research’s latest issue of The Payments Report asked payment cardholders about their appetite for point-of-sale installment plans and found that consumers who exclusively use or prefer debit cards are most likely to consider using them, even for everyday items.

Installment plans have historically been used for larger purchases like furniture and household appliances. However, offers for small to mid-size purchases have increased in popularity at the point-of-sale and sometimes post-purchase, making a range of purchase types possible. Providers like Affirm, American Express, and Amazon offer consumers the option to buy now but pay over a specified period (with transparent terms and pricing). While the specifics differ slightly by provider, the core offering remains the same: a consumer doesn’t need to pay for their entire purchase at once.

This product has wide appeal but resonates most strongly for debit users. Four-in-ten would consider using an installment plan for everyday purchases like groceries and household items. The option allows them to access credit in a way that provides more control, making purchases more manageable, and ultimately more affordable.

Six-in-ten debit cardholders find point-of-sale installment plans attractive, but many have never been offered one. Only 28% of debit cardholders report being offered an installment plan in-store, while more (45%) recall being offered one online. Regardless of channel, both groups that recalled offers reacted positively. Over four-in-ten debit cardholders enrolled in at least one of their in-store (48%) or online (41%) installment plan offers at the point-of-sale. Installment plans appeal to credit cardholders, as well: Although only 17% of credit cardholders received an offer to pay for purchases in installments, 51% of those offered do enroll.

“The structure of an installment plan is very attractive to debit cardholders,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Auriemma Research. “And while credit cardholders have the option of paying off their card balance at their leisure, they, too, clearly have an appetite for something a bit more concrete.”

For many, borrowing via an installment plan is less intimidating than revolving on a credit card. According to a recent issue of The Payments Report, about seven-in-ten cardholders feel installment plans are helpful in budgeting expenses and that they help alleviate the stress of making large purchases. Overall, cardholders appreciate that installment plans provide a time period to pay off the balance.

Understandably, bigger ticket items like electronics, home appliances, and furniture top the list of purchases placed on point-of-sale installment plans, but nearly one-quarter used the product to purchase clothing, and 17% for a shopping cart of items.

“Whether for purchases large or small, installment plans are redefining how consumers view affordability, particularly for those without credit cards,” says Holmes. “Some cardholders find the uncertainty and responsibility of paying back money borrowed on a credit card intimidating, whereas installment plans provide a clearer path and time frame for repayment.”

Survey Methodology

This Auriemma Research study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) in February 2019 among 800 adult debit cardholders. The number of interviews completed for both is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing among sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ±5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed, nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying. The average interview length was 25 minutes.

About Auriemma Group

For more than 30 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.

/by
, , ,

Contactless Card Rollout May Not Hurt Mobile Payment Adoption, But Probably Won’t Help Either

(New York, NY) The death of plastic. Apple Pay’s launch in 2014 invited headlines touting the digital payments revolution, but in the years since, plastic has thrived. Consumers swiped, they dipped, and now they’re beginning to tap– all with a physical card. Some argue that the proliferation of tapping a physical card at checkout will increase comfort tapping one’s phone. However, a new issue of Auriemma Research’s Mobile Pay Tracker suggests that contactless cards may have some mobile-friendly consumers reverting from digital to physical payments.

Although mobile payments and contactless cards utilize the same near-field communication (NFC) technology, adoption of mobile payments is well behind contactless cards. Three plus years after its mainstream release, mobile payments have only been used by one-third of those eligible—far less than the 59% of contactless cardholders who have tapped with their contactless card.

Consumers appear amenable to contactless cards, specifically because the device (i.e., the physical card) is so familiar. Mobile payment users, however, are even more open to tapping their cards because they’ve been exposed to tapping with their phone. Three-quarters of mobile payment users have used a contactless card to make a contactless payment, compared to just four-in-ten non-users.

“Consumers have been repeatedly asked to change their payment behavior,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Auriemma Research. “While adjusting to various card payments is easy, the larger switch in the physical mechanism of phone payments takes more time.”

Mobile payment users are enthusiastic about contactless technology. The majority (60%) expressed interest in using contactless cards, compared to just over one-quarter of mobile payment non-users. Mobile payment users are also more likely to believe contactless payments can improve everyday purchases. Over one-third say their experience with self-checkout lanes, grocery stores, vending machines, and public transportation would be made better if they were able to use contactless payments.

Until now, many terminals were not accepting of EMV contactless payments because of outdated technology. This has been a struggle for EMV contactless cards as well as Apple, Google, and Samsung Pay. However, with Visa now requiring all contactless terminals to support NFC contactless technology, both EMV contactless cards and mobile payments will have the space to grow.

Although these upgrades will make mobile payments an option at an increasing number of locations, that doesn’t mean mobile payment adoption will rise. Overall, consumers are uncertain about whether contactless card payments are better or worse than mobile payments—65% say they are about the same, 18% say they are better, and 17% say they are worse.

Those who believe contactless card payments are better typically say they are faster, easier, and more secure than mobile payments—three things mobile payment users often describe when asked why it is better to pay with mobile then with plastic. Those who believe contactless card payments are worse often express concerns about security (e.g., more susceptible to fraud, wouldn’t be any safer) and say they still need to take out their payment card.

“Consumers will have more options at checkout than ever before, but will they choose contactless cards or a mobile wallet?” asks Holmes. “Although upgraded terminals benefit both methods, the point-of-sale experience continues to be fragmented for mobile payment users who must pull out their physical card when things go awry.”

With contactless cards, technological barriers to tapping won’t upend the entire payment process. Consumers can still dip or swipe. This alone makes the case for contactless cards, which offer the mobile payment benefits people love without the barriers that have persisted since its rollout.

Survey Methodology

This Auriemma Research study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) between January-February 2019, among 2,001 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 8/8+7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+/SE/X or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S9, S9+, S8, S8 Edge/Edge+, S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7, or Note 8 – Gear S2 or S3 watch (in combination with an Android/iPhone smartphone) – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name.

About Auriemma Group

For more than 30 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.

/by
, ,

Higher Rates Aren’t Enough for Monzo and Other Mobile-Only Banks to Topple Traditional Players

(London, UK):  Three-in-ten cardholders are interested in switching to mobile-only banking options if they offer superior interest rates and rewards, creating a potentially major disruption for traditional banks, according to new research from Auriemma Group. And digital challenger banks, like Monzo, Atom Bank and Tandem Bank are competitively courting traditional bank customers with their modern technology and slick user experience.

While these new digital challengers pressure traditional banks to add new services and offer rich digital experiences to their customers, the realities of operating costs and large, physical footprints put incumbents at a slight disadvantage in responding quickly to the competitive environment.

With less overhead, digital challengers can nimbly offer richer rates or other attractive offers. For example, Atom Bank and Tandem Bank, currently offer 2.00% AER on one-year fixed saver accounts, compared to well under 1.00% for Barclays, Lloyds, and HSBC.

Despite those offers, most consumers don’t know about the competitive rates mobile-only banks offer. Less than one-in-ten UK cardholders are familiar with digital challenger banks, and the 47% uninterested in switching to one often say it’s because they don’t know enough about them. Consumers are most familiar with Monzo at 9%, followed by Atom Bank and Tandem Bank at 8% and 7% respectively.

“The struggle for mobile-only banks will be educating consumers on their service—most haven’t heard of them,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Payment Insights at Auriemma. “Traditional institutions should be looking to these challengers and adopting the features and functionalities customers are most excited about before the banks become mainstream.”

For traditional banks, marketing the features where they beat the digital-only players—such as savings on current accounts, regular savers, and other perks—will be key to stand out amid the more niche benefits of digital challengers. Other types of features and functionalities that would be attractive to consumers include the ability to quickly connect to customer service agents by phone or chat, a well-designed, user-friendly app interface and the ability to use biometrics for logins and transactions.

Some consumers say they will remain loyal to their traditional bank regardless of the development of new innovations or services because they’re currently satisfied with the service (47%) or simply prefer banks that have a physical location (36%).

Mobile-only banks will need to overcome consumers’ lack of familiarity with mobile-only banks and loyalty to traditional banks, but they could potentially catch up by communicating their value to younger cardholders, who are more likely to make the switch.

But these aren’t the only difficulties ahead for digital challengers. For example, only one-in-five of Monzo’s users deposit their salary, according to a Reuters interview with Tom Blomfield, Monzo’s chief executive. And Auriemma’s research found that 59% of credit cardholders would not trust financial technology startups with their banking data.

“Having origins in the prepaid space has limited consumers’ perception of Monzo’s capabilities,” says Holmes. “As a bank, Monzo is now tasked with changing some of these perceptions and building greater trust in its brand.”

In an effort to be viewed more like a traditional bank, Monzo announced this month that customers won’t be able to top up their account with a debit card. Instead, Monzo will accept funds via bank transfer. Changes like this, and the push for users to utilise direct deposit, are the first steps in getting consumers to use Monzo, and other digital challengers, as their primary bank.

“The challenges mobile-only banks face as they navigate a market dominated by established, trusted banks are many, but the group could have a bright future,” says Holmes. “If nothing else, their very existence will cause traditional banks to rethink their offerings and focus on innovation—a huge win for consumers across the UK.”

 Survey Methodology

This study was conducted online within the UK by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma in July 2018, among 800 adult credit cardholders. The number of interviews completed on a monthly basis is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing between sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ± 5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed nor did the respondents know the criteria for qualification. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at +44 (0) 2076-290075.

/by
, , ,

How Instalment Plans Can Alleviate Persistent Credit Card Debt

(London, UK): Consumers experiencing or on the brink of persistent debt are now covered by new rules and guidance aimed at protecting them, thanks to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The FCA is calling upon issuers to identify and assist at-risk consumers and those within the cycle of persistent debt. In a policy statement released on 27 February 2018, the regulator anticipates savings up to £1.3bn a year in lowered interest charges for those in persistent debt. It would benefit issuers, however, to help at-risk consumers before they get to this point. Instalment plans can be used to discourage persistent debt and ultimately encourage healthier payment behaviours.

Instalment plans are popular among consumers who receive offers for them. New data from Auriemma shows 61% of those solicited have taken one – but a minority (38%) of credit cardholders have ever been offered an instalment plan. Regardless of whether they receive an offer, consumers like the benefits instalment plans can provide, particularly being forced to pay off their balance within a set period (58%) and reducing the stress of large purchases (54%). These motivating factors encourage big ticket purchases while also setting clear expectations for payment, a win-win for lenders who want to best serve at-risk customers and help them develop positive payment habits.

“Instalment plans give consumers a great way to manage their budgets by spreading the cost of a purchase over a series of fixed monthly payments,” says Wendy Bradley, Director at Auriemma. “They take the guesswork out of how much is owed each month. By preempting the negative experience of persistent debt with the more positive, guided experience of an instalment plan, issuers can rescue what may otherwise become a contentious customer relationship.”

 Some creative solutions in the marketplace bundle an instalment plan feature within a more traditional credit card product. And while consumers are mixed on whether they prefer the flexibility of revolving or the predictability or instalment plans, a blended product has the potential to cater to individual preferences while garnering interest from a larger pool of customers. If created, the offering would need to have an optimal user experience and be communicated simply and clearly—41% of consumers believe the terms of instalment plans are too confusing.

“Instalment plans are typically presented at the point of sale for larger purchases, but they could also be a tool for issuers to help their customers manage their existing unsecured debt,” says Bradley. “While they don’t guarantee repayment, instalment plans could help motivate consistent repayment behaviours to get customers back in good standing before they require the greater assistance the FCA’s new guidance calls for.”

 Survey Methodology

This study was conducted online within the UK by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma in November-December 2017, among 500 adult credit cardholders. The number of interviews completed on a monthly basis is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing between sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ± 5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed nor did the respondents know the criteria for qualification.

About Auriemma Group

For more than 30 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognised experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximise their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in London and New York City. For more information, call +44 (0) 2076-290075.

/by
, , ,

Fewer than Half of US Cardholders Have Received a Chip Card and Many Don’t Know How to Use It

(New York, NY):   With just under a month until the US EMV liability shift takes effect, less than half of US credit card holders have received a chip card from their issuer, and many of them have never used it as intended, according to recent Cardbeat® research conducted by Auriemma Group. In a June survey of 400 US adult credit cardholders, nearly half (47%) of respondents report having received at least one EMV credit card, and one-quarter hold an EMV debit card. While EMV card conversion will likely continue into 2016, issuer migration efforts so far appear to far exceed those of merchants – recent projections estimate merchant terminal enablement could be as low as 25% through October. Though few merchants have transitioned to EMV terminals, customers are already perceiving a less efficient checkout experience at the point of sale.

The Cardbeat data show that nearly half of EMV cardholders (47%) have not inserted their chip card into a terminal, and among these individuals, nearly eight in ten (78%) have never encountered a chip-enabled terminal. “Even though many issuers are providing their cardholders chip cards and general communications about them, this information will be forgotten if cardholders aren’t able to form the new habit of using their card with a chip reader until months later,” says Jaclyn Holmes, Senior Manager of Auriemma’s Payment Insights. “While most respondents said that the communications they received with their new EMV cards was clear, we found considerable misinformation among consumers. The majority of respondents believe that chip cards are inherently more secure – even when used at a conventional terminal – and that they should just continue to swipe their card.”

The Cardbeat research shows that cardholders typically understand that EMV cards are more secure – 67% correctly know it’s more difficult for unauthorized users to counterfeit a chip card than a standard magnetic stripe card, 58% understand the chip encrypts personal information into a unique code, and 55% know dipping a chip card is more secure than swiping a magnetic stripe card.  On the other hand, chip card functionality and usage in merchant-enabled EMV terminals is less understood. More than two in five cardholders (44%) incorrectly believe swiping a chip card is more secure than swiping a magnetic stripe card, and a similar proportion (39%) were unsure. Furthermore, over half (52%) of those currently holding a chip card said they would prefer to swipe their chip card, even if a retailer has chip-enabled terminals. “Cardholders do not have a good understanding that in order to benefit from the increased security chip cards offer, the chip must be inserted into the reader – nor do they seem to understand that once merchant-enabled terminals are turned on, they may not have a choice,” Holmes noted.

So far, research shows that the customer experience resulting from the EMV migration has been less than satisfactory – over one-third (35%) of EMV cardholders who have tried to use their chip card in an enabled terminal say they have encountered difficulties. A similar proportion of all respondents (37%) have encountered checkout delays because another shopper had difficulties. Nearly half of cardholders (48%) said that EMV transactions take noticeably longer than magnetic stripe transactions to complete, attributable to the requirement to leave the card in the reader throughout the transaction. Merchants shouldn’t be surprised if a large number of cardholders remove their cards too quickly from the readers – 64% of cardholders are unaware that they must keep their card in the reader until the transaction is completed, otherwise the transaction will be terminated. “Due to the gap in merchant deployment, education in chip cards will have to be ongoing, and merchants will need to match the efforts of issuers. With the holiday shopping season right around the corner, this is the opportune time to iron out the problems,” Holmes said, “because customer resistance during the high shopping season could make for a lot of unnecessarily angry customers.”

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space.  We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information about Auriemma’s Payment Insights, please call 212-323-7000.

/by
© Copyright - Auriemma Group