(New York, NY):  Mobile pay users are an enthusiastic bunch, but admit they sometimes forget to choose mobile payments at checkout. New data from Auriemma Group’s Mobile Pay Tracker suggests that transaction-based incentives may provide the nudge needed to get higher frequency and spend through mobile pay. The study of 1,505 mobile pay eligible cardholders didn’t just reveal incentive’s benefits to Pay providers, but to issuers and merchants as well. Those who leverage incentives are positioning themselves for greater success as mobile payments become more commonplace.

Regardless of who funds the incentives, issuers, merchants, and Pay-app providers all have something to gain. Increases in mobile pay spend and frequency of use will have a marked impact on the most frequently used (MFU) card in the mobile wallet, while also encouraging use of mobile pay instead of a physical wallet. As the mobile pay user population grows, it will become increasingly important to be the top of mobile wallet card. Interestingly, two-thirds of mobile pay users already say that the MFU card in mobile pay is also their most used card overall.

“While cards used in the mobile wallet benefit from merchant- and Pay-funded incentives in the short term, those not already being used could miss out, especially as mobile pay grows,” said Jaclyn Holmes, Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights. “Pay apps very well may be the future of payments. Incentives provide an opportunity for issuers and merchants to have consumers associate their brand with the payment method, which could turn out to be a valuable long-term investment.”

Currently, 25% of consumers with an eligible smartphone use mobile pay, mostly composed of a highly covetable demographic of employed, affluent, and college-educated consumers. Of these consumers, 32% recall being offered a mobile pay incentive (compared to 19% earlier in the year), and when the incentive is offered, the take rate is high: 86% of incentive recipients report claiming the incentive at the point of sale in-store or in-app.

In the past, these incentives were primarily offered by banks, but in Auriemma’s most recent study the proportion of banks offering incentives to their customers compared to last quarter dropped from 58% to 40%. Merchant-funded offers are now most prevalent (46%), and regardless of who offered the incentive, nearly eight in ten respondents (78%) report their offer was linked to a specific merchant. Many consumers, however, are not seeking these incentives out—most hear about them from friends, or through emails or letters.

Consumers who are offered incentives, unsurprisingly, use mobile payments more frequently than those not offered—demonstrating a clear influence on choice of payment method at checkout. Over a one-week period, for example, those who received an incentive to use mobile pay in-store did so 4.6 times, compared to 3.1 times for those not offered an incentive. The same is true of in-app purchases, with incentivized shoppers purchasing four times in a week, compared to 2.4 for those not offered an incentive.

“Incentives can give consumers the push they need to use mobile pay,” said Holmes. “Their greatest impact will be on consumers on the cusp of using the method, but who need an additional nudge.”

Survey Methodology

This study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group in November 2016, among 1,505 mobile pay eligible consumers. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 7/7+/6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S) – a Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, S7 Active, a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5, Note 7 – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer. All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, ten in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted during December 2016.

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information, call Jaclyn Holmes at 212-323-7000.

 

 

(New York, NY):  For the past several years, there has been an unprecedented level of activity in the U.S. co-brand marketplace, with many of the country’s largest programs coming to the end of their existing issuer and network contracts. That growth will continue, but in new pockets of the industry, according to Auriemma Group, a boutique management consultancy focused on the consumer payment industry.

Recently, many marquee retail and T&E programs, such as Amazon, American Airlines, Costco and Cabela’s, conducted competitive selection processes that received an extremely high level of interest from potential issuing partners. With few deals of that size expected to hit the market in 2017, Auriemma anticipates co-brand expansion will come from several less-explored areas.

“The U.S. co-brand market has been extremely active for the past few years and while a few major programs did shift partners, the overall landscape did not change that dramatically,” said Gary Rezak, Director of Partnerships for Auriemma. “Most of the leading issuing banks and payment networks still have the desire to grow, and they are actively seeking new partnerships.”

More online/mobile-only companies will start co-brand programs. As consumers continue to shift their spending away from traditional brick-and-mortar locations, the co-brand issuing community is starting to look online as well.  “Some of these less traditional retailers are generating large volumes of traffic and revenue,” says Rezak. “These newer companies need additional tools to generate loyalty and for many, a co-brand card is an ideal solution.” And while issuers might not have been that interested in these types of partnerships a few years ago, they certainly are today. Companies that cater to a difficult to reach audience, such as millennials will be particularly attractive.

Issuer interest in de novo programs will extend to more established companies. With credit card portfolios remaining lucrative for issuers, there will continue to be a strong push to increase assets. And while banks continue to actively acquire customers for their proprietary card products, competition for customers is intensifying, with costs for rewards and acquisitions escalating. Co-brand will become an increasingly attractive option. “Co-brand partnerships enable unique value propositions and exclusive marketing channels,” said Rezak. Auriemma anticipates new co-brand programs to come from a variety of industry sectors including financial, auto and telecommunications. In the past, issuers were solely focused on Retail and T&E, but as opportunities for new partnerships in these sectors have diminished, issuers have become more willing to broaden their partnerships targets.

Second-look issuing will continue to gain traction. Traditional co-brand issuing banks tend to cater to prime credit consumers, but most brands have customers from all ends of the credit spectrum. Second-look programs allow a brand to cater to more customers, without disrupting the prime issuer’s program.  “We’ve seen more brands negotiating for the right to offer second-look programs as part of the contract process,” Rezak said. “The sub-prime credit market has a lot of opportunity and we anticipate that many second-look programs will begin in 2017 and beyond.”  When implemented correctly, these types of programs have little downside.  Issuers focused on second-look programs have developed an expertise in managing the increased risk associated with this population, without disruption to the consumer, brand partner or prime issuer.

While 2017 may not be the year of the marquee deal, it holds plenty of promise for both issuers and brands in less-trafficked corners of the industry.

 About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.  For more information, please contact Gary Rezak at 212-323-7000.

(New York, NY):  Last month, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published its proposal to debut a national bank charter specifically for fintech companies and invited public comment on potential implications of the measure.  Auriemma responded to the OCC’s request with a comment letter assessing the proposal’s possible effects on non-bank lenders, payment companies as well as traditional banks.

The core of the OCC proposal is offering a national banking charter to a segment of fintech companies, such as payments technology and marketplace lenders, that provides recipients with the ability to forgo deposits (and skip the FDIC insurance process), while still having the advantages of a national bank charter. For fintech companies with consumer lending businesses, this is especially useful in simplifying pricing, as a national bank charter would allow such companies to select one domicile for determination of rates and regulations and to “export” them to consumers in other geographical areas.

Currently, non-bank lenders are often in contractual relationships with “originating” banks as a way to indirectly achieve national bank advantages, such as avoiding the “state-by-state” regulatory compliance model historically used by non-bank finance companies. The new charter would eliminate the need for an originating bank and allow the OCC to more directly regulate these activities.

Fintech firms would be primarily regulated by the OCC, but this proposal makes clear that all other relevant regulators would still be involved (e.g., a public company would still be regulated by the SEC also).  If a fintech bank elected to be an FDIC depository, for example, the FDIC would also be a key regulator. (Among the most unique features of the charter is that the FDIC insurance is not a requirement, but rather an election.)

Should the proposal move forward, it could also signal a flow of new equity capital moving into the banking sector. (Many institutional equity investors had been sidelined by the current interplay of the Bank Holding Company Act and the FDIC insurance requirement.) This would mark a return of the same investors who flocked to the non-bank fintech companies to participate in consumer credit without these regulatory impediments.

Still up in the air: the appropriate level of regulatory capital that would be needed by a fintech bank. While a non-FDIC insured institution presents no risk to the FDIC guaranty fund, it may still present systemic/contagion risks. Similarly, a non-FDIC insured institution would not fall under the Community Reinvestment Act, but the OCC will still expect fintech companies to address financial “inclusion.” It remains to be seen how this could be addressed outside of the CRA framework.

Since the OCC published its proposal, political opposition has emerged.  Some state Attorneys General and Senators Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore) are questioning the new charter, saying it is a way to avoid state usury and compliance laws.  Although the OCC did not expect this to become a partisan issue, it now appears likely to become one.

Ultimately, we view this proposal as the OCC offering fintech companies national bank preemption in exchange for direct supervision.  While fintech companies have always had the option of becoming a bank, the new charter makes this more acceptable to institutional equity investors while simultaneously safeguarding the insured deposit base.  Clearly, the OCC is open to revisiting some traditional bank regulatory matters from a new vantage point.

 About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information, contact John Costa at (212) 323-7000.

Dec. 1, 2016

Dear Friends,

This is our 25th annual letter to clients and as usual, there’s no shortage of hot topics to discuss. The major news items are easy to tick off: Brexit, Wells Fargo, the U.S. Presidential election, and now Yahoo, just to name a few. It was a banner year for bombshells, pessimists, and the doomsday crowd. So, it wouldn’t be hard to fill this letter with downbeat stories. But those stories have been covered ad nauseam in the press and around the water cooler. Instead, I’ve decided to take a step back and consider the other side of the coin… the upside… the positive stories that surrounded us every day but seemed to get lost in the news cycle. When I stepped back, I realized there was plenty of positive change, innovation, and growth about which to be optimistic.

The upbeat theme for this letter wasn’t reflexive, though. Rather, the inspiration came to me while in Rio for the Olympics with my children.

Each day, my kids and I were blown away by the pride and enthusiasm among the athletes, their coaches, and the fans. We saw ten events, and purposely avoided many of the more mainstream offerings. Instead, we witnessed indoor cycling, weightlifting, decathlon, Tae Kwon Do, and others. We found that media hype had no correlation to the enthusiasm of the participants or their cheering sections. In fact, it seemed that if you bought a ticket for Olympic wrestling (for example), there was a strong likelihood that you knew someone competing in the event. So, perhaps the cheers were even louder!

There were countless amazing moments – hearing the Japanese fans chanting for their female gold-medalist… watching the Brazilian grounds keeper wave his flag from the tractor between equestrian events… witnessing the martial artist from Ivory Coast fall to the mat in tears upon winning gold… hearing the loudest EVER rendition of a National Anthem when the Brazilian boxer won gold… stomping our feet and chanting along with the Kazakhstan team as their compatriot narrowly missed medaling in weightlifting. These and countless other moments brought goosebumps to even the most jaded spectator.

Being surrounded by such positive energy was contagious and uplifting. It made me wonder:  how do we infuse some of that amazing energy into our industry? The more I thought about it, the more I realized, we already have lots of very positive and exciting things to cheer for. Perhaps they just needed a light shone upon them more directly. So, below are some of the accomplishments that I think we should look back on with pride as we reflect on 2016.

Let’s start with a quick example. In the post-recession era, how many times have we heard that customers don’t want another credit card? Don’t tell that to JPMorgan Chase which successfully debuted the Chase Sapphire Reserve card with a whopping $450 annual fee. The card has been a resounding success, particularly among millennials – a demographic that countless news stories told us was particularly credit-averse and unlikely to be wooed by card providers.

Chase found a winning combination for a customer who is primarily motivated by rewards. This hunger for rewards, which has been covered often in ACG’s proprietary consumer research, has, in turn, meant that the co-brand industry is thriving and flourishing, with a wide range of large programs making strides of late.

Perhaps the most sought-after co-brand deal of the year was Cabela’s, one of the last major retail self-issuers, which resulted in a watershed $5 billion deal for Capital One. American Airlines was also in play this year due to its recent merger with US Airways. Just as in Rio, where only one Gold medal is awarded, conventional wisdom would have expected one of the two incumbent issuers to land the combined deal. Instead, the Airline wound up maintaining programs with both Citi and Barclays, leveraging each for its strongest acquisition channels. Time will tell if that was two Gold medals or a Gold and a Silver.

Although Costco chose its new partners in 2015, the deal rolled out to consumers early this year. After reports of some conversion headaches, the results have been extremely positive for Citibank, Visa, and the Retailer

In the U.K., where interchange has been cut to roughly 30 basis points, many experts worried about the future of co-branding. ACG has been hard at work helping both issuers and partners to determine a deal structure that could survive in the new environment. Perhaps the first manifestation can be seen in BNP Paribas’ Creation Financial Services’ recent deal with InterContinental Hotel Group. The partners have managed to create a successful program and even improve the customer value proposition by taking a fresh look at the business model. Not only was the card nominated as the Best Credit Card Product of the Year by The Card & Payments Awards, but it is proof that co-branding can still work in Europe. You simply need partners that are pragmatic and willing to work together to drive value for the consumer.

Co-brand competition will continue well into 2017. Hilton will perhaps be the first to watch as it determines which of its two current issuers will manage its program into the future. A couple of recent mergers will also likely cause a stir as Marriott/Starwood and Alaska Airlines/Virgin America come together and sort out their various card programs. On top of this, other marquee programs will be up for renewal and several very interesting names have signaled their desire for de novo programs.

We’ll also have to keep an eye on Washington as we try to read the tea leaves for 2017. Economists are fond of the Latin phrase “ceteris paribus” which roughly translates into “all other things being unchanged.” If you are a banker (or own bank stock) and apply that phrase, you are probably feeling pretty good since the U.S. Presidential election. Your stock is likely feeling the effect of the “Trump Bump,” and you may be anticipating a near-term environment of higher interest rates, lower tax rates, and less regulation.

While less regulation would be welcomed in certain quarters, it must be said that, even in the face of an increasingly stringent regulatory environment, our industry has found ways to innovate and excel. For example, regulations like the TCPA hindered the efforts of the Collections industry. The restrictions it set forth necessitated changes to the business model and in time the industry adapted. Enhancements in self-service, proactive client interactions, and “opt-in” mechanisms for communications, all led to a net positive for issuers and their customers.

The CFPB started supervising non-bank auto finance companies in 2015. Our clients quickly built capable Compliance teams and developed a rapport with the examiners. When you consider the speed at which these lenders expanded and invested in Compliance operations to handle large-scale audits with a brand-new regulator, the progress is impressive.

Mortgage lenders have also successfully navigated the ever-more-challenging scrutiny by regulators, often having State and Federal auditors onsite simultaneously. Meanwhile, they continued to emphasize staffing, processing, and technology improvements to keep customer experience paramount. Going forward, these lenders can look forward to HAMP coming to an end, property values gaining strength, reductions in modifications and short sales, and an uptick in originations.

Over the summer, the CFPB released an outline of proposals under consideration to overhaul the debt collection market. The agency limited the scope of its actions, saying it would address first-party creditors and third-party debt collectors in separate proceedings. This is exactly what ACG had recommended in comments to the CFPB when the rulemaking process began in 2013. The overhaul, which will include new requirements on debt substantiation, expanded disclosures, and limited “excessive” communications, represents the first major refresh for the industry since the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act was enacted in the 1970s. The CFPB’s willingness to listen to the industry and hone the application of its rules was widely appreciated. Perhaps it was even an example of how regulators and lenders can work together to meet their respective objectives.

Earlier this year, the FCA recognized the nuances of the card business as well. The U.K. agency released its Credit Card Market Study, and while many anticipated the report would be a wide-ranging critique of the industry, it instead focused on the needs of consumers with persistent debt. The FCA is currently conducting research on how to improve consumer repayment behavior, with everything from behavioral cues and statement language on the table. This is an opportunity for the U.K. credit card market to creatively serve the needs of these customers, as well as to proactively help improve consumers’ financial health.

The lessons learned from the Great Recession continue to inform industry decisions. All our lending clients have been watching closely for signs of pending trouble. Indeed, there are some signs of a potential cyclical downturn afoot. Delinquencies and credit declines are both on the uptick, for example. However, the fact that we are so keenly watching the landscape is a major improvement from previous cycles. It wasn’t long ago that in the wake of a credit crisis, a large number of bankers admitted to American Banker that their credit models had failed to accurately predict losses. Our current vigilance suggests an industry that is better prepared than ever.

After years of hesitancy and skepticism, EMV is finally coming of age in the U.S. By now, over 85% of our clients’ portfolios have been converted. In 2017, nearly all issuers will have migrated, dealing a blow to counterfeit fraud. Some clients have even reported that they’ve already recouped the expenditure of reissuing their chip cards.

Meanwhile, the continued increase of chip-on-chip transactions should help reduce the customer experience challenges still evident at POS, where customers often must quiz store employees if they should be swiping or using the chip. The uneven acceptance strategies across some of the nation’s biggest retailers have left customers cold – and tweeting thousands of jokes at the payment industry’s expense.

Retailers who were not EMV-compliant saw an uptick in card-present chargebacks due to the liability shift. But as more retailers expand their EMV acceptance, that chargeback category will decline. We anticipate rates should begin to normalize and then improve over pre-EMV rates, which is good news across the board.

While EMV migration has blunted fraud in face-to-face transactions, the fraud has shifted elsewhere. Card-not-present and old fraudster favorites like check, wire, and ACH fraud are on the rise. It may be hard to see the good news here – unless you’re a criminal. However, the industry is working together in unprecedented ways to curtail some of the newer strands of fraud that are emerging. For example, ACG just launched a roundtable for retailers to address the challenges of payments fraud in a post-EMV world.

Fraudsters are also increasingly deploying synthetic fraud, an esoteric fraud type that uses stolen data (often from children and the elderly) to open new accounts. This fraud is nearly impossible to proactively identify, since current consumer privacy concerns hamper efforts by credit bureaus to validate social security numbers. The key to defusing this fast-growing fraud is industry cooperation. Earlier this year, ACG gathered more than 30 representatives from issuers, industry associations and networks, and credit bureaus to discuss how to tackle the problem. The path forward will require navigating a legislative thicket, but at least the conversation is underway.

Mobile payments have also gained ground this year. When Apple Pay hit the market two years ago, the headlines decried the imminent death of credit cards. Two years later, the headlines have reversed, calling mobile a major flop. Both sides of the spectrum are wildly exaggerated. While 2016 certainly wasn’t the “Year of Mobile Payments,” we never really expected it to be. Nor do we expect that 2017 or even 2018 will earn that title. Instead, consumer adoption will be gradual as consumer preference evolves and technology matures.

Issuers lament the lack of enough mobile volume to impact their overall results. But, according to ACG’s Cardbeat® research, just over half of cardholders have the option of using Apple, Android or Samsung mobile payments, due to their phone’s capabilities. Of those, 31% are doing so at least some of the time. That’s a pretty good take rate for a brand-new product. Additionally, there’s a small universe of mobile payments invisibly thriving via apps such as Uber, Starbucks, and Venmo.

Players like PayPal have also continued to make major strides in the digital and P2P spaces. In our most recent Cardbeat research, PayPal beat out the major banks to be the favorite P2P service for consumers. While consumers claim to trust their banks more implicitly with their financial information, 69% say PayPal’s technology is superior to the banks’ ability to protect their information. Banks are coming to grips with this in a variety of ways. Citi recently hired over 40 employees from start-ups and tech companies to start its own FinTech division. Others, like BBVA and USAA, are forging partnerships with FinTech companies to develop new solutions and stay nimble. Even auto lenders are contemplating FinTech acquisitions to bolster their capabilities in credit verification and decisioning.

The global political landscape of 2016 can be characterized by shock and upheaval. Voters from the U.S. to the U.K. to Italy to Colombia, have surprised the world with their decisions. The status quo has been upended, and what this means for our industry and markets is still being decided.

ACG’s mission is to provide guidance for challenging decisions in challenging times. While we may not be able to change the behavior of regulators, consumers, or fraudsters, we can help clients to influence outcomes and deal with ramifications. We can help to decipher trends, prepare a good offense and/or a strong defense.

In 2017, you can expect ACG to unveil several initiatives in our ongoing effort to enhance our offerings. In addition to improving the analytical tools and customer experience in our proprietary VIZOR platform, we’ll be debuting a research portal for our Payments Insights data called CAMBER. Both of these platforms demonstrate our commitment to providing the rich data necessary to make meaningful decisions.

We’ll also be altering our physical and digital footprints. A new website with refreshed branding is in store for release later in the year. Our Twitter account will be more active. And, after years of managing our growth in creative ways within our current spaces in the Financial District of New York City and Farringdon in London, we’ll be making changes to both offices. Our London team will be relocating to new and upgraded offices, while our New York headquarters will be renovated to make room for a larger team. Both offices will see new and exciting designs meant to enhance our ability to work effectively. We look forward to hosting you at our new facilities before long.

As we wrap up 2016, it’s obvious that the world’s events can’t be boiled down into a letter any more than they can be squeezed into 140 characters on Twitter, a snapshot on Instagram, or a shaky video that disappears on Snapchat.  These are complex times, and I’ve fielded hundreds of phone calls and hosted scores of clients in our offices, all to dissect these topics. We are always happy to engage in discussions with you at any point, as well as to share the direction our data and intelligence say the winds are blowing.

Let’s kick-start 2017 by talking a little more about the sheer ingenuity, innovation, and optimism that permeates our industry. Let’s stomp our feet, wave our flags, and cheer on our competitors. Here’s to a productive, positive and, most importantly, happy and healthy year.

 

Best,

Michael

 

 

 

 

John Costa, Managing Director of Auriemma Finance, has published an article in American Banker’s BankThink section. The piece focuses on large banks downsizing through a sale or spinoff of their credit card business.

You can read the full story here: Why Big Banks Would Do Well to Spin Off Credit Cards

For more information, contact John Costa at john.costa@auriemma.group or 212-323-7000.

(New York, NY) PayPal’s clout with consumers is dominating its competition in the alternative payments space, according to recent consumer research by Auriemma Group. The study of 800 US adult credit cardholders took an in-depth look at alternative payment providers, comparing PayPal’s online checkout and P2P offerings to other notable platforms. Consumers responded with a clear preference for PayPal, citing greater familiarity, usage, popularity, and more secure technology than other providers.

“PayPal is doing a lot of things right,” said Jaclyn Holmes, the Auriemma Senior Manager who directed the study. “They are the clear favorite in the online checkout space and have earned a positive reputation with consumers. The PayPal brand is valuable, so much so that just knowing Venmo was a PayPal product increases the likelihood of cardholders using the service.”

When compared with its peers, PayPal is the most recognized and used online checkout service, with 77% of cardholders familiar with the service and 62% of those familiar currently using the service. And PayPal customers are loyal, with 81% preferring it for online transactions, and 79% using it whenever they can. This type of praise is also common for PayPal Me, PayPal’s P2P offering, which is highly favored among consumers who have tried more than one P2P app (42% prefer PayPal Me compared to 19% who prefer their bank’s P2P payment service). Banks, however, do have some strengths when compared to PayPal—notably in direct deposit, ease of accepting payments, card selection and ease of use.

Despite its overall high marks, PayPal fell short of its competition on overall trust with financial information (80% of consumers trust their primary bank; only 55% said the same about PayPal). And the majority of consumers (56%) are generally unwilling to direct deposit money into their PayPal account. There is a nuance, however: While banks win for overall trust, 69% of consumers say they believe PayPal’s technology is better at protecting their financial information.

“Although cardholders’ relationships are deeper with their primary bank than with PayPal, the fact that consumers believe PayPal’s technology is more secure may be problematic for issuers. Consumers expect financial providers to be as savvy as the players in Silicon Valley,” says Holmes. “Until financial institutions are seen as technological equals with PayPal, the brand has a clear advantage in this arena.”

Survey Methodology

The studies were conducted online within the United States by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group in August 2016, among 800 credit card users each (“cardholders”). The number of interviews completed on a monthly basis is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing between sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ± 5%, unless otherwise noted.

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space.  We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.

 

(New York, NY):  US consumers worry about payment card fraud, with over half saying it’s increased in the past year.  And it’s not an idle fear—42% have personally experienced card fraud, half of them multiple times.  But almost all report a satisfactory resolution by their bank, according to recent research from Auriemma Group. The recent survey of 500 debit cardholders found that many consumers are fatalist about the chances of it happening again: 46% think it’s likely that they’ll experience card fraud in the next five years.

Consumers are skeptical about the efficacy of security solutions in the market.  While most consider chip cards to be more secure than the traditional mag stripe, only 32% think that the introduction of chip cards has decreased the level of card fraud, while the majority (58%), say that EMV has had no impact.

Despite these doubts, cardholders express willingness to use stronger authentication methods.  Only 38% say they’ve encountered two-step authentication, but the great majority agree that there are some sites where they’d prefer this safety measure. 70% say they’d enable two-step authentication for their online account if it were offered by their primary bank.

Their willingness to go through a more time-consuming process varies by the size of the transaction, however.  When asked about a hypothetical $100 purchase, 85% agreed that security is more important than speed.  In the case of a $5 purchase, however, that drops to 70%, with 30% who want that transaction to be fast, ‘even if it means fewer security steps’. “The importance of security seems to fluctuate according to purchase amount,” said Jaclyn Holmes, the senior manager who directed the study. “In reality, the amount of the purchase has nothing to do with a fraudster’s ability to steal a consumer’s information, but consumers tend to care more about speed than security for smaller transactions.”

And despite their concern with security, Americans confess to taking time-saving shortcuts.  More than two-thirds save passwords on their devices for at least some of their accounts, most commonly email and social media.  Not surprisingly, the lure of convenience increases with the amount of online activity: 30% of those who shop online weekly say they save the password for nearly all their accounts, double the proportion of less frequent shoppers.

One of the most popular ways to save time online is by using one-click checkouts, and Amazon’s 1-Click and PayPal’s One Touch, the two most popular, both have high levels of satisfaction.  But non-users fear that this convenience comes at a price.  While almost two-thirds of all respondents thinks one-click makes the payment process more enjoyable, virtually the same percentage say it will make online shopping more vulnerable to fraud. “Many cardholders are uneasy with the idea of being permanently logged on,” Holmes notes. “Consumers appreciate the convenience of being able to breeze through online check-out with a single click, but it may be leading some to wonder whether that same convenience could make them a tempting target for fraud.”

The idea that extra security takes extra time makes sense to these consumers:  their new, more secure chip card transactions take longer, and they want two-step sign-ins on their most sensitive accounts.  “This mind-set may make it harder for mobile payments to gain mass acceptance”, says Marianne Berry, Auriemma’s Managing Director of Payment Insights. When asked to choose the most secure payment method, 42% of survey respondents chose chip cards, three times the number that chose mobile.  “Most early adopters of mobile payments have some understanding of the concept of tokenization and view it as a very secure way to pay,” Berry noted.  “But in the general population, mobile’s speed and convenience can equate to being less safe.  To convert non-users, marketing messages should highlight how mobile pay transactions mask the payment card information.  Consumers need to hear that it’s just as safe as a chip card transaction, but faster—and a lot more fun.”

Survey Methodology

The study was conducted online among 500 debit card users in May 2016. Respondents were recruited from Instantly’s web panel, and fieldwork was conducted by Issues and Answers. The purpose of the research was not disclosed nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying. The average interview length was 20 minutes.

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space.  We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.

(New York, NY): For over a year after its introduction, Apple Pay was the only real option for consumers who wanted to pay with their smartphone. That changed towards the end of 2015, when Android Pay and Samsung Pay were rolled out. Among the three payment options, Apple Pay captures the greatest proportion of eligible users, with 33% of iPhone 6 owners* reporting that they’ve used it, but the fledgling Samsung Pay isn’t far behind at 23%, according to recent research by Auriemma Group. The firm’s latest Mobile Pay Tracker found that Samsung Pay users report higher satisfaction levels and fewer issues at the point of sale compared to Apple Pay, with near equal proportions recommending both mobile payment brands.

Since its inception, Apple Pay has attracted educated, affluent, and young users, and Samsung Pay users look similar. “Only the newest, and most expensive, models of phone support mobile payment, so owners tend to be affluent,” says Marianne Berry, Managing Director of Auriemma’s Payment Insights practice. “Owners of the Samsung Galaxy and Note look demographically similar to owners of the iPhone 6 series, although iPhone owners are almost evenly divided between men and women, whereas Android phones, Samsung included, tend to skew male.”  Within the pool of eligible phone owners, mobile pay users are even more affluent and well-educated than non-users.

Users of both mobile pays rate their experience positively, but Samsung Pay users report higher levels of satisfaction than their Apple Pay counterparts (92% vs. 84%) and are near equally likely to recommend the application (49% vs. 53%). “The impact of satisfaction becomes more telling when we examine how these users pay for their monthly purchases,” says Berry. “The majority of Samsung Pay users utilize other payment methods less since beginning with Samsung Pay. No other mobile payment application can say that.” In fact, Samsung Pay eligible consumers report the highest proportion of discretionary spend going to the payment app (22%), while Apple Pay eligible consumers cite a lesser proportion (15%), behind both credit card and cash spend.

Samsung Pay users also spend more using the service ($82 vs. $75) within an average week. They report fewer difficulties at point of sale (19% vs. 31% for Apple Pay), presumably due to the technology that mimics the magnetic stripe and allows it to be used at a much wider range of merchants. “Samsung Pay advertising highlights this benefit, and 37% of those who are aware of this have used the method where other mobile pays aren’t accepted,” says Berry.

Where signage isn’t easily viewable, Samsung Pay users show greater enthusiasm to use the method in-store, with 56% always asking store personnel about acceptance compared to 42% of Apple Pay users. “Some of this may be due to its newness, with most Samsung users reporting three months of experience compared to a year for Apple Pay,” says Berry. “Even so, Samsung Pay outscores Apple Pay on a number of metrics. Right now the pool of eligible Samsung users is much smaller than Apple’s, but as more Samsung phones are upgraded, the application’s broader merchant acceptance has the potential to more quickly convert its smartphone owners to Pay users.”

Survey Methodology

The study was conducted online among 2004 consumers in the US with Apple Pay eligible (n=1,000), Android Pay eligible (n=838), and/or Samsung Pay eligible (n=327) smartphones between March 3 – April 7, 2016. Respondents were screened to own an iPhone 6/6+/6s/6s+ or Apple Watch (in combination with an iPhone 5/5C/5S)* – a Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge/Edge+, S6 Active or Galaxy Note 5 – and/or other Android phone with KitKat (4.4) OS or newer.  All respondents also have a general purpose credit card in their own name. In addition to the quantitative web survey, twenty in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted March 21, 2016 – March 25, 2016 via telephone with Android Pay and Samsung Pay users recruited from the quantitative web survey. For this round of IDIs, the focus is or was on the Android and Samsung Pay users, and their usage and experience thus far.

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space.  We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.

(New York, NY) As the UK prepares to vote on whether to remain in the European Union, Britons debate the strength of their ties to Europe. When it comes to their financial behavior, however, they are clearly more similar to their American, rather than their Continental, cousins. While usage of credit cards in European markets such as France and Germany remain stubbornly low, both the US and the UK are reporting rapidly mounting levels of credit card debt, approaching levels not seen since the heady days preceding the financial crisis.[1] And while the US is usually seen as the poster child for “buy now, pay later,” UK cardholders aren’t so different, nearly equally likely to revolve balances on at least one card, according to newly released research from Auriemma Group, which conducted parallel studies in both markets.

Although on opposite sides of the northern Atlantic, payment behavior in the US and the UK is eerily similar, save a few key differences. It’s true, on average, US consumers hold more credit cards than their UK counterparts (2.3 vs. 1.9), but an equal proportion (26%) of each market frequently carries a balance on them. American and British consumers are also nearly identical when looking at balance transfers (10% vs. 13%), missed payments (11% vs. 13%), and credit card inactivity (24% vs. 27%) within the past year. “We generally find the same things important, but perhaps to varying degrees,” says Jaclyn Holmes, the Auriemma senior manager who directed the study. “This also translates when examining payment behavior. US cardholders, for example, are more likely to be incentivized by rewards or cashback offers, but both populations select this as the top offer that would make them use less frequently used cards more.”

A majority of consumers in both markets (65% in the US, 59% in the UK) cite the most obvious reason, “high spending,” for revolving balances. These revolvers try to pay off the credit card with the highest APR first, but UK cardholders more frequently cite allocating extra funds to paying off the card they use most frequently (22% vs. 16%). “Britons don’t want to lose access to that credit line,” says Holmes. “Twice as many UK cardholders say they rely on borrowing to afford day-to-day purchases so paying down that card first makes sense.”

Borrowing, of course, isn’t just limited to credit cards. Consumers in the US and the UK both cite taking out a mortgage (69% vs. 62%), emergencies (59% vs. 56%), and making large purchases (33% vs. 32%) as justifiable reasons to borrow. Auto loans, however, are much more widely held in the US (61% vs. 40%), while UK cardholders more often cite funding a creative project (23% vs. 15%) or managing cash flow (17% vs. 13%). “About one-third of each market has taken out a personal loan, but UK cardholders are nearly twice as likely to borrow for debt consolidation,” says Holmes. “Britons believe the repayment schedule would be easier with a personal loan, while those in the US more often cite wanting to build their credit history.”

For financial institutions wishing to better understand consumers across the pond, the good news is that payment behavior is generally similar regardless of locale. “Sure, US and UK consumers are not carbon copies of one another,” says Holmes, “but, based on our research, it looks like we are more alike than some may initially think.”

Survey Methodology

Cardbeat US was conducted online within the United States by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Consulting Group in April 2016, among 800 U.S. credit card users. Cardbeat UK was conducted online among 500 credit cardholders in the U.K. during March 2016. The number of interviews completed is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing between sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ± 5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed nor did the respondents know the criteria for qualifying.

About Auriemma Group

 Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space.  We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines.  Founded in 1984, ACG has grown from a one-man shop to a nearly 50-person firm with offices in New York and London.  For more information, contact Jaclyn Holmes at (212) 323-7000.

[1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/balance-due-credit-card-debt-nears-1-trillion-as-banks-push-plastic-1463736600
http://www.reuters.com/article/britain-banks-lending-idUSL3N18D3SX

(New York, NY):  As shifts in consumer preferences mete out consequences for retail stores, one segment is investing heavily in brick-and-mortar locations to generate new sales: co-brand programs.

Retailers that offer co-brand and private-label credit cards are ramping up direct marketing efforts through the physical point of sale and investing in technology, employee incentives, and other initiatives to modernize that channel and maximize its growth potential. According to a survey conducted by Auriemma, 57 percent of brand partners with physical, online, and mobile commerce footprints are forecasting in-store account acquisitions growth through end of year and planning to increase investments in the near term.

“Retailers are doubling down on store-centric strategies as a tool for increasing cardholder acquisitions,” said Diana Middleton, Director of Auriemma’s Brand Partner Roundtable, an information-sharing group for senior retail payment executives. “Brand partners are well aware that customers are changing the way they shop, and deploying tactical investments to boost what has historically been the best-performing channel.”

In fact, retail stores remain a leading outlet for card sales: physical locations generated 71 percent of account acquisitions in 2015, according to Auriemma’s Brand Partner Roundtable Benchmark Study, and tend to have higher applicant approval rates.

Planned investments reflect a bullish outlook on stores as part of larger cardholder acquisition strategies, despite slipping comparable sales and declining foot traffic. While retailers begin trimming their physical expansion plans and closing under-performing stores, and as consumers increasingly migrate to online and mobile environments, physical locations are expected to remain a key driver of account openings. Many brand partners still view store associates as the most effective means for communicating the value proposition associated with card products and delivering relevant information and offers to customers.

Still, retailers are adapting their techniques to reflect a growing digital audience and the reality of declining brick-and-mortar store visits. Increasingly, investments are designed to promote greater integration with omni-channel strategies for branded card programs.

“Brand partners are taking proactive steps to maximize the potential of this existing and very formidable channel,” Middleton said. “Program managers are identifying better and more personalized ways to serve customers, preserve face-to-face relationships, and bring the point of sale into the digital era.”

These methods include equipping stores with more sophisticated technology, identifying migration patterns between physical and digital customer touch points, and analyzing how shifting behavior affects customers’ lifecycle value. A key part of this strategy is identifying highly-active omni-channel shoppers in-store and delivering pre-approved offers at the point of sale.

New technologies, including tablets and other mobile devices as an acquisitions tool and more sophisticated customer relationship management (CRM) systems, could open an avenue for instant pre-approval, reduce application times, and eliminate friction.

A more fundamental long-term challenge will be sustaining leads in the absence of store footprint expansion, which has traditionally generated large sums of new customers and accounts. With fewer new store openings, brand partners will need to identify new potential cardholders within their physical footprint, as well as maximize the performance of digital channels.

“Today, brand partners have to be more strategic in how they target customers in their existing stores,” Middleton said. “Identifying that white space – customers that don’t have the card product – is critical.”

As efforts to optimize the in-store acquisitions channel continue, brand partners are also turning attention to online and mobile in particular. Program managers are investing equally in stores and more cost-efficient digital channels with a high perceived return on investment – especially as cost-per-acquisition in stores is expected to increase over time. However, challenges abound – from maintaining clarity of message and cutting through competing offers to improving opt-in rates and online targeting.

About the Brand Partner Roundtable

Open exclusively to retailers, the Brand Partner Roundtable focuses on designing and executing card programs that benefit members’ core retail business. Discussions give participants the tools and information they need to improve their program’s value proposition and acquisition strategy, eliminate fraud, and fine-tune mobile and digital enhancements.

About Auriemma Group

Auriemma is a boutique management consulting firm with specialized focus on the Payments and Lending space. We deliver actionable solutions and insights that add value to our clients’ business activities across a broad set of industry topics and disciplines. For more information about Auriemma’s Industry Roundtables, please contact Tom LaMagna at 212-323-7000.

© Copyright - Auriemma Group